Nido Farms
Hero candidate — sunset over Costa Ballena, refuge in foreground.
Lane A · Reg D 506(c)

A 330-hectare refuge, twenty-two operating units, and a long arc to compound.

Hacienda Barú has been protected under Decreto Ejecutivo Nº 24639-MIRENEM since 6 October 1995. Twelve buildings on the property already host guests; ten glamping tents will join them. The numbers below are the model under its Lane A scenario — accredited investors evaluating that entry point will find the structure on this page.

What the numbers say

The Lane A preset, over a ten-year hold.

The figures below are outputs from the interactive financial model under its Lane A scenario. Every assumption is a slider in the model itself; what is reported here is what the model reports there. They are not marketing language. They are the model speaking.

21.2%

Net IRR · year 10

Lane A reference band: 8–15%

3.24×

DPI

Distributions to paid-in capital, post-debt

19.6%

Cap Rate · year 3

Yr-3 NOI on $14M acquisition

4.9 yrs

Payback

Cumulative equity recovery

Mid-scenario · yr-1 occupancy 62% · yr-2+ 80% · opex 36% · F&B food cost 17% · $14M acquisition · $6M owner down + 15% EBITDA residual capped at $10M cumulative. See the model for the full assumption set.

Why it holds together

Four reasons the model does what it does.

The land is protected by decree

On 6 October 1995, Decreto Ejecutivo Nº 24639-MIRENEM was published in La Gaceta Nº 190, declaring the 330-hectare property a Refugio Nacional de Vida Silvestre — Categoría Mixta. The protection is decree-level, not easement. Forty years of stewardship under Jack Ewing's hand are the substrate the operation rests on.

Twelve existing buildings, refurbished

Six studios at $2,200/week, four two-bed at $2,800/week, two three-bed at $3,500/week. Ten new glamping tents at $1,500/week join them. Year-1 occupancy settles at 55–70%, then steadies at 70–90% from year two. The rates and counts come from the operator, not industry comparables.

The seller is paid as the operation performs

Senior debt anchors the bottom of the stack. The seller receives $6M at close and a 15% share of EBITDA after senior service, capped at $10M cumulative. Seller upside compounds with performance; the cap protects both sides. LP and GP equity sizes the remainder — roughly $9.9M against $19.9M in total uses.

Five revenue lines, one refuge

Lodging is the anchor. A farm-to-table restaurant, eco tours that grow year over year, a children's park sized for 100 kids a day, and stewardship projects across the greater parcel layer on top. No single line carries the model; each line draws strength from the refuge that contains them all.

Capital Stack

Sources and uses, sized to align the seller.

The seller takes cash at close and a capped share of EBITDA — the seller's outcome and the project's outcome move together. Senior debt anchors the bottom of the stack. Equity sizes what remains.

Uses · $19.9M
  • Acquisition$14.0M
  • Face Lift (12 bldgs)$1.5M
  • Glamping (10 × $200K)$2.0M
  • Programs / Kids Park$0.5M
  • F&B fitout$0.5M
  • Off-grid infra$0.9M
  • Working capital$0.5M
Sources · $19.9M
  • Senior debt (6.5% · 10y, interest-only)$4.0M
  • Owner cash down (at close)$6.0M
  • LP / GP equity$9.9M

Plus: 15% of EBITDA annually to seller (after senior debt service), capped at $10M cumulative. Cap reached typically by year 7-9; remainder waived at exit.

Unit Economics

Twenty-two units. Operator-set weekly rates.

Twelve buildings already stand on the property and will be refurbished, not rebuilt. Ten glamping tents join them. Year-1 occupancy settles at 55–70%; year-2 onward steadies at 70–90%. The rates below come from the operator and are slider-tunable in the model.

Unit typeCountSleepsWeekly rate
Studios62-4$2,200
Two-Bedroom42-4$2,800
Three-Bedroom24-6$3,500
Glamping Tents103-4$1,500
Total · annual potential at 100% occ22$2.41M
$4.66M

Yr-3 revenue

Across lodging · F&B · Eco Tours · Kids Park · stewardship

$2.75M

Yr-3 NOI

Pre-debt-service · 59% margin at mid scenario

$20.9M

Terminal Value

At 7× yr-10 EBITDA exit multiple

What could go wrong

Four risks. Four reasons we can hold through them.

No investment is free of downside. These are the four the operator and the diligence team return to most often, and the structural reasons each remains within the model's tolerance.

Risk

Hospitality demand softens

Mitigation

Lodging is one of five revenue lines. Eco tours, the children's park, and the farm-to-table restaurant carry local-resident and day-visitor catchment that does not depend on overnight occupancy. The refuge itself remains the draw.

Risk

Construction runs long on glamping

Mitigation

Glamping is the only new build — $2M against $19.9M in total uses. The twelve existing buildings are refurbished, not rebuilt. The construction envelope is bounded and can be staged across years.

Risk

Costa Rica country risk

Mitigation

Costa Rica abolished its standing army in 1949. The refuge decree has been continuously honored since 1995 across every administration since. SINAC and FONAFIFO are the operating counterparts — both long-running, both well-mapped.

Risk

Operator continuity

Mitigation

Jack Ewing's forty-year record continues into the reposition as advisor. The lodge has been operated continuously since 1987. Nido Farms layers a family-centered hospitality programme onto an operation that already runs.

An honest conversation

Run the numbers, then write us.

The model lets you move every assumption — occupancy bands, the owner residual, the exit multiple, the stewardship expansion — and watch the outputs recompute as you go. The figures on this page sit on the Lane A scenario; one click moves them to Family Flagship or Soft Launch.

When the numbers are useful and you would like the written brief, the investor brief is one email away.

Run the financial modelRequest the investor brief

Reg D 506(c) — accredited investors only. This page is illustrative for partnership discussions and is not an offer to sell or solicit any security.